Luke McGuff (holyoutlaw) wrote,
Luke McGuff

Why: Urban Forest

I was a little bit into this work before encountering the phrase “urban forest.” I find it amusing, there’s a bit of self-contradiction to it to me. You don’t expect the word “forest” to follow “urban.”

But the forest remains — thin, neglected, and patchy as it may be. To my mind, abandoning the city altogether for a supposedly ideal forest helps neither the city nor the supposed ideal. And I think it’s important to realize that not only is the urban forest still here, but the needs for it remain as well: air cooling and cleaning, water filtering and slowing, carbon sequestration, habitat.

There’s no chance anymore to let “nature take its course.” We have to take an active hand in the management of the planet, and I think a good place to start is our neighborhood urban forest.

Mirrored from Nature Intrudes. Please comment over there.

Tags: commentary, urban forest, urban restoration, why

  • New terms of service

    Because of the new terms of service, I am deleting my LiveJournal permanently.

  • Book Notes

    Only two books in February -- guess I was hit more strongly by malaise than I thought. Also, i was sick for a week. Four Modern Prophets William M.…

  • YESC Seattle at Golden Gardens

    About 25-30 high school students from YESC Seattle ( YMCA Earth Services Corps) joined us at Golden Gardens on Saturday, Jan. 30. We removed ivy…

Comments for this post were disabled by the author